Last Post.....

What can I say about our class? I don't think that I could tell you all everything I want to say or discuss with you about. From the start, I felt this class was very strange, very different. I loved it, and I was very content with my decision to transfer out of my other DSP class (My army class), even though it did seem very interesting. :p You all made the class worthwhile, and so did our teachers. I felt like I could be open with each one of you, and that I could talk to you all about just about anything. Our teachers were also very understanding and showed us they cared about us daily by asking questions like 'How are you?' and saying things like 'Take care.' The projects were all fun and very...intense, Hahah. They came at us very fast. There was a lot of information to acquire and to learn. The SL project really showed me that I needed to step-up my game because our teachers grade hard, lol. But that's a good thing. It showed me that I needed to be thinking on a deeper level, and the only way to see on a different level is to expose yourself to different viewpoints. By intensive observation and research, they attempted to show us this. I always thought that I would be terrible at observation projects and that they would be impossible for me. I was surprised to find I could hold my own, with guidance from our teachers, of course. I feel that the projects were also very intriguing, and led us to questions that we could continue to solve throughout our years here at UK.
As Rupert mentioned, I have also advanced technology-wise by taking this class. This was the first time I had ever made a blog, or played an online sim (extensively). I enjoyed learning these things immensely, and I plan to keep my SL account and go in-world whenever I get bored and have nothing else to do, or I'm not facebooking, haha. (I just got one of those after coming here, too.) ~.~"

I like how we continued to follow-up on the readings. I feel like this has also given me a deeper understanding of the concepts presented in them. I haven't been used to doing this, and I like seeing the application of concepts that I have learned. For instance, Appiah's goals for cosmopolitan interaction (Which he insists is something we owe to others) to not only tolerate one another, but to genuinely seek to know and understand what others value despite our fears of looking ridiculous have been an integral part of the way I behaved in our class. And this was continuously brought up by group projects. I wonder how different it would have been if we had been assigned groups? Maybe we would have felt too forced to exhibit this behavior? How does that tie in with my UK project thesis that language classes should enforce cross-language social experience? O.o
I think this concept of being obligated to understand difference will also come in handy when I go to Japan, hopefully this summer.

Everyone, please keep in touch!! ^.^

Showcase!

I was surprised by how large our showcase group turned out to be (Raito, Reecie, Rasay, Rupert, Elle, Azriquel, Maekeo and Phoolendu). I thought that we would have three or four men squads like we did with our SL groups. But I'm glad that we have such a large group. I feel that because our group is so large, we will be able to make the showcase a lot more interesting and to show off a lot more.
We all got together and organized the powerpoint over the weekend, taking slides from our various SL group projects and adding some reflective information. This powerpoint will be running continously in the background on one computer while we guide visitors to our display through various places in SL, their possible 'virtual reincarnation' if they choose to represent themselves the same as they would out-of-world, on another. Thus, our name, which our group developed with difficulty together: Team SL; Guiding You Through Your Virtual Reincarnation. I really need to work on my SL skills before the showcase so that I can be able to show people how to walk around and use the camera controls. One of my cameras disappeared and I never could figure out how to get it back.
I guess we will just let people talk and walk around. I don't think we'll let them mess with the appearance of our avatars. I don't really know what to show people...I guess I'll just see what about SL they would be interested in. I think we are dependent on SL to get people interested in the class, and then the powerpoint is in charge of telling them what we learned. But it should be a lot of fun, and hopefully our attitudes will be contagious and represent the class well.

Late Post...~.~"

Yeah so, I didn't read the list of blog outlines in the wiki before I wrote this week, and I think that this post is totally overdue! ESL script should have been written on monday, because it better covers the requested material. I just redid my analysis a little while ago, and I feel a little better about it now, but I would still love to get feedback on it. I feel like I'm getting closer to beign on track, but I don't want to jinx it. ~.~" I know I still need to find some background information and write my visual sweep, and I also need to do my annotations. I'm so ready for Christmas!! @.@
I feel like Tuesday's class helped a lot. I think I may just see if I can find something on one of the sites that we were given in class for my background info. I emailed a librarian tonight and went and talked to some people at the circ desk who told me where I needed to call to reach the ref. desk because my last two emails went unanswered. >.<"

Hopefully I can just stay on track this last big week!! ^.^"

Newest Version of Analysis, Please Comment!! ~.~"

The sitting area in the back of Patterson Office Tower is a small space which falls in-between the classrooms in which meet the English as a Second Language classes, as well as other foreign language classes, like Japanese 101. Since foreign language classes tend to encourage conversation among students not only in the language being learned but in the speakers’ native tongue, I wondered if the space outside of the classrooms was a cosmopolitan canopy or just an extension of the relationships formed in the foreign language classes. Elijah Anderson, author of “The Cosmopolitan Canopy,” informs us that a canopy is a place where “folk ethnography” takes place. Folk Ethnography is when people learn about the values and beliefs of others and use what they’ve learned to shape their own.
I feel that my hypothesis about the back of Patterson being a cosmopolitan canopy was disproved. Elijah Anderson described a canopy as a ‘nuetral’ place, and in many ways, the sitting area is ‘nuetral.’ The students who sit in the back of Patterson tend to be understanding and tolerant of one another, as well as curious. This can be seen by their habit of eavesdropping (See interview 002). However, the students don’t act upon this curiosity by initiating social interaction. Anderson’s canopy is neutral in the fact that people treat each other civilly, but it is not neutral in the way people receive the beliefs and behaviors of others, by passivity to social experimentation. In Patterson, people acknowledge each other civilly and tolerantly, but don’t make an attempt to truly understand or learn about others’ viewpoints spontaneously. For instance, in Interview 002, another person sitting in the area, as well as myself, came into contact with some extremely noisy visitors to the back of the building, but neither of us reprimanded or scolded them for being agitators to the silence between us.
Interview 002
I was sitting in the back of Patterson with one other girl and we were both on our computers, when this guy comes in yelling on his cell phone. He lingers a minute at the door, then goes outside to find someone, continues to yell outside, fails to find the person he is looking for, comes back in, and sits down on the bench huffing and puffing. He then leaves and walks through again later. Another guy sings extremely loud while on his way to get on an elevator. She turns her head to look at him, but the elevator door closes, and we exchange looks of curiosity. Then I asked her a few questions.
Did he have earphones in?
I don’t know, I couldn’t see…
I couldn’t either…
Here my interview was rather choppy, because then I mentioned the yelling guy…
If someone called you in here and there were a bunch of people, would you answer your phone and talk in here, or would you leave?
Is it quiet or loud?
Good question…
I don’t answer my phone in quiet places. I might answer it in here if there were a few people, but not if there were a lot.
What if that yelling guy had talked in here?
I would have listened to his conversation…
Were you going to tell him to be quiet (Elevator guy)?
No, I think it’s entertaining…
At this point, I began to wonder if the type of conversation had anything to do with whether or not the area was suitable to carry it out…
What if you were having a conversation like that yelling guy, where you were having a confrontation on the phone?
I would definitely go outside because I know that if I’m listening to other people’s conversations, other people are too. I don’t want to make a fool of myself.

Many of my informants believed in the possibility of communication with members of what the Japanese would call the “Out-group,” or members not within their circles (The circles being, in this case, certain sections of a Japanese class) or, as Kwame Appiah, the writer of Cosmopolitan would put it, with “Imaginary strangers” (Appiah, Cosmopolitanism page 87). But most of them admitted to staying within their own social circles formed in class and to not starting conversations with people they didn’t know from class. For example, in interview 6, my informant claimed “No, it’s mostly people we already know.” None of the other informants seemed to take advantage of the rich variety of different viewpoints from people of different ethnicities by practicing the language they were learning or by simply starting a conversation with someone of a different race.
Part of the complication seemed to be that they were afraid to seem the fool, as stated in interview 002. This fear leads them to wait for the more socially adept and curious to come to them. Informant 6 also insists that “They’ve got to be the starter” and informant 4 mentions, “So I sit here and listen to people talk and then maybe someone will talk to me.” In some cases, they stand with their classmates and don’t sit down at all. A Cosmopolitan Canopy is a place of action and reaction, where people enlighten each other and discuss values, beliefs and other ways of life through spontaneous face-to-face conversations as well as through listening and observing. How could the back of Patterson Office Tower be a canopy if everyone is waiting unproductively for an exchange of words that more than likely isn’t going to occur because everyone else is waiting, too? By embracing their fears of “looking the fool,” the visitors to Patterson could become so much more knowledgeable.
It would seem that most visitors to the waiting area expect some noise (Though few expect it at the level in which it occurred above; this was a rare occurrence throughout my investigations) even if they don’t come to interact. Some do come for the interaction (See interview 4), however, many wouldn’t come if they didn’t have a class, or were waiting for a class and had something else to do. Over and over again in my interviews I heard the answer “I have nothing better to do,” when I asked the question “Why do you come here so early?” or made a remark about how early my informants were (See interviews 1 and 3). A few people study when they come, but people usually don’t come just to do so. As seen by the frequency they occur in my interviews, study groups are actually quite rare in the foreign language classes, though some of the other classes that meet in the area seem to be more dependent on them. Availability of the English as a Second Language students may also be an inhibitor to cosmopolitan behavior, since the ESL classes are held early in the morning and the Japanese classes in the middle of the afternoon. The fact that few people take advantage of the variety of different viewpoints in the sitting area in the back of Patterson can be seen by how people position themselves within the space, which is separated into two halves because of a large open hallway opposite the exit doors. People from different sections of the same class tend to sit on different halves of the room, and they don’t typically sit with people they don’t know unless the benches are full.
In the words of my informant from interview 4, “Conversation it itself is study.” The ESL teachers are always welcoming native English speakers interested in attending their classes, in the hopes that they may help their students learn English by interacting with the English-speaking students. If foreign language classes made it mandatory to attend at least one ESL class, or vice-versa, it would open up possibilities for both groups to learn more in their respective language studies, as well as encourage each other to initiate conversation. Also, since the two Japanese classes meet so close, and at a time interval that doesn’t seem to be too far apart for most students, who often arrive early to class, it might be beneficial to encourage students to hold one conversation with someone from another section of the class so that they might practice their Japanese. I feel that if the teachers of the Japanese and ESL classes were to require some social interaction between classes or sections of the same class, it would bring students closer together and influence them to initiate conversation with one another more often by making them feel more comfortable and by breaking the ice.

Analysis...Please Help!!! @.@

If anyone doesn't mind, would you please read and critique or comment on this?? I was having some real issues trying to write it and I could really use your help!!
Just some things to think about...
if you think of other problems, please let me know!!
>Am I writing on the right level? Are my connections deep enough or too short? Or too much?

Analysis
The sitting area in the back of Patterson Office Tower is a small space which falls in-between the classrooms in which meet the English as a Second Language classes, as well as other language classes, such as Japanese. Since foreign language classes tend to encourage conversation not only in the language being learned but in the speakers’ native tongue, I wondered if the space outside the classrooms was a cosmopolitan canopy or just an extension of the relationships formed in the classrooms. Elijah Anderson, author of “The Cosmopolitan Canopy,” informs us that a canopy is a place where “folk ethnography” takes place. Folk Ethnography is when people learn about the values and beliefs of others and use what they’ve learned to shape their own.
I feel that my hypothesis was disproved, and that my site was actually what Elijah Anderson, writer of “The Cosmopolitan Canopy,’ would describe as a ‘neutral’ place. In this type of place, people acknowledge each other civilly, but don’t make an attempt to truly understand others’ viewpoints. Though many of my informants believed in the possibility of communication with members of what the Japanese would call the “Out-group,” or members not within their circle (The circle being, in this case, a certain section of a Japanese class) or, as Kwame Appiah, the writer of Cosmopolitan would put it, the “imaginary stranger”(people we have an idea about but don’t really know), many of them admitted to staying within their own social circles formed in class and to not starting conversations with people they didn’t know from class. For example, in interview 6, my informant claims “No, it’s mostly people we already know.” None of the other informants claimed to take advantage of the rich variety of different viewpoints from people of different ethnicities by practicing the language they were learning or by simply starting a conversation with someone of a different race. Informant 6 also insists that “They’ve got to be the starter” and informant 4 mentions, “So I sit here and listen to people talk and then maybe someone will talk to me.” The fact that few people take advantage of the variety of different viewpoints in the sitting area in the back of Patterson can also be seen by how people position themselves within the space, which is separated into two halves because of a large open hallway opposite the exit doors. People from different sections of the same class tend to sit on different halves of the room, and they don’t typically sit with people they don’t know unless the benches are full. In some cases, they stand with their classmates and don’t sit down at all. A Cosmopolitan Canopy is a place of action and reaction, where people enlighten each other and discuss values, beliefs and other ways of life face-to-face as well as through listening and observing. How could the back of Patterson Office Tower be a canopy if everyone is waiting unproductively for an exchange of words that more than likely isn’t going to occur because everyone else is waiting, too? By embracing their fears of “looking the fool,” (Interview 6) the visitors to Patterson could become so much more knowledgeable. More than likely, if they tried speaking more to the international students, they would be treated with understanding and civility as well.
Interview 6
1) Do you come early or late to class? (You can say neither.)
Early-to interact
2) You’re a freshman, right?
Yes.
3) How would you describe the people that meet in this area?
Outgoing; social
4) Do people introduce themselves?
No, its mostly people we already know.
5) Why not? Is it because of the atmosphere or the people?
Probably the people; It’s not a fun place to be and it’s not comfortable because the doors open and they don’t close and it’s cold.
6) Would you introduce yourself to someone from a different class?
No, probably not.
7) Why?
I’m scared…
8) How full would you let a bench get before you wouldn’t sit there?
3 people is full…
9) Would you sit by someone from another class?
If there were no seats left.
10) Would you talk to them?
No.
11) What if they started talking to you?
I would talk. They’ve got to be the starter.
12) Have you noticed people standing when the benches are full?
Yes.
13) How do people on the other side respond to people on this side?
They react to our conversations.
14) And yet nobody talks to them…why?
Maybe other people don’t care what they think.

Despite this distancing, both groups are actually quite wary of each other. In interview six, my informant mentioned that the other class tends to “react to our conversations.” It’s just as Anderson mentions in his paper about the Reading Terminal Market, which he supports as a cosmopolitan canopy: “Simply put, cosmopolitan canopies are interesting places to engage in the fine art of “people watching,” for “all kinds” of folk are represented(Anderson 21). Mostly people react to others in a civil and benign way:
Interview 002
I was sitting in the back of Patterson with one other girl and we were both on our computers, when this guy comes in yelling on his cell phone. He lingers a minute at the door, then goes outside to find someone, continues to yell outside, fails to find the person he is looking for, comes back in, and sits down on the bench huffing and puffing. He then leaves and walks through again later. Another guy sings extremely loud while on his way to get on an elevator. She turns her head to look at him, but the elevator door closes, and we exchange looks of curiosity. Then I asked her a few questions.
Did he have earphones in?
I don’t know, I couldn’t see…
I couldn’t either…
Here my interview was rather choppy, because then I mentioned the yelling guy…
If someone called you in here and there were a bunch of people, would you answer your phone and talk in here, or would you leave?
Is it quiet or loud?
Good question…
I don’t answer my phone in quiet places. I might answer it in here if there were a few people, but not if there were a lot.
What if that yelling guy had talked in here?
I would have listened to his conversation…
Were you going to tell him to be quiet (Elevator guy)?
No, I think it’s entertaining…
At this point, I began to wonder if the type of conversation had anything to do with whether or not the area was suitable to carry it out…
What if you were having a conversation like that yelling guy, where you were having a confrontation on the phone?
I would definitely go outside because I know that if I’m listening to other people’s conversations, other people are too. I don’t want to make a fool of myself.

As seen by interview 002, people notice each other and react with curiosity, but they do not usually tend to reprimand each other. Instead, they practice tolerance. It would seem that most visitors to the waiting area expect some noise even if they don’t come to interact. Some do come for the interaction (See interview 4), however, many wouldn’t come if they didn’t have a class, or were waiting for a class and had something else to do. Over and over again in my interviews I heard the answer “I have nothing better to do,” when I asked the question “Why do you come here so early?” or made a remark about how early to class my informants were (See interviews 1 and 3). A few people study when they come, but people usually don’t come just to do so. As seen by the frequency they occur in my interviews, study groups are actually quite rare.

Yeah, so, I didn't read the list of blog outlines in the wiki before I wrote this week, and I think that this post is totally overdue! ESL script should have been written on monday, because it better covers the requested material. I just redid my analyses a little while ago, and I feel a little better about it now, but I would still love to get some feedback on it. I feel like I'm getting on track, but I don't want to jinx it. ~.~" I know I still have to find some bg info. and I also need to do my annotations. I'm so ready for Christmas!! @.@

I feel like Tuesday's class helped a lot. I think I may just see if I can find something on one of the sites that we were given for my background info. I emailed a librarian tonight and went and talked to some people at the circ desk who helped show me where I needed to call to reach the ref. desk because my last two emails went unanswered. >.<"

Hopefully I can just stay on track this last big week!! ^.^'

ESL Script and Pics~!!! ^_^

So, I feel like I should have at least one interview from a teacher in the ESL program. I'm not sure if my paper would be complete without it. I plan on doing the extra interview tomorrow morning, but here's the script if anyone is on tonight and or tomorrow morning and has any suggestions. ^_^

ESL Informant Script
1) Why did you want to become an ESL teacher? When did you decide you wanted to do so?
2) Was there any certain reason you came to UK?
3) How long have you been an ESL teacher?
4) How would you describe students in the ESL program?
5) Why would you say they participate in ESL?
6) How have you noticed them interact with each other? Do they seem friendly or hostile? Why do you think so?
7) How do English-speaking students in this area respond to them? Do they shy away or embrace non-native speakers? How so?
8) What are some common behaviors you have seen with students in your classes? Are they outgoing or shy?
9) Describe your current students.
10) Do you hear them speak about hanging out together or alone?
11) Do they linger outside the door?
12) Why do you believe they do so or do not do so?
13) Have you ever noticed them using English outside of class?

And here are the pics of the back of POT that I promised!!! : )

This is a bad picture because of the lighting, but this is one of the benches by the "ghost" doors that open just because of the wind and make the room cooler. It's on the side that my classmates used to sit on, as opposed to the side where the other class sits. If you'll notice also, there are the tall windows that let in natural lighting. As many of us have found, lighting seems to be an important lure because it creates ambiance. Maybe people find it more natural to revert to the basic practice of socialization here partly because of the natural lighting? It could also brighten the mood if it's clear skies or sunny out.

A more inclusive picture of "Our" side... The "Other" side...More to come... : ) Thanks for viewing!! Please comment on the script if you can think of anything, or even just to tell me you enjoyed the pictures...or how much the camera angle or flash sucked because I'm not a prophotographer...hahah.

OH! BTW!! I'd really like to thank the guy who has continuosly let me rent out a camera...he was very kind and helpful! You should definitely go talk to him in Patterson in the Writing Dep. and rent out a camera!!! Yay, pics!! *.*

Today's Interview

So today I worked on an ESL teacher informant script and took some pictures. I also took another interview:

1) Do you come early or to class? (You can say neither.)
Early-to interact.
2) You’re a freshman, right?
Yes.
3) How would you describe the people that meet in this area?
Outgoing; social
4) Do people introduce themselves?
No, it mostly people we already know.
5) Why not? Is it because of the atmosphere or the people?
Probably the people; It’s not a fun place to be and it’s not comfortable because the doors open and they don’t close and it’s cold.
6) Would you introduce yourself to someone from a different class?
No, probably not.
7) Why?
I’m scared…
8) How full would you let a bench get before you wouldn’t sit there?
3 people is full…
9) Would you sit by someone from another class?
If there were no seats left.
10) Would you talk to them?
No.
11) What if they started talking to you?
I would talk. They’ve got to be the starter.
12) Have you noticed people standing when the benches are full?
Yes.
13) How do people on the other side respond to people on this side?
They react to our conversations.
Maybe other people don’t care what they think.

Pictures and the ESL script will soon follow! : ) Stumble across ya' later! ^.^'

Yeah, so the name of my last post was kinda lame...~.~" Hopefully it was at least attention-getting and got some of you to read the post...speaking of which, thanks so much for your comment, Reecie!!

I hope everyone has a great break!!
^_^

Here is my last interview before the break...it's not the best...but please enjoy.

Do you feel that there’s a cultural divide here? Do people mainly hang out with people of their own ethnicity?
No problem. I mainly hang out with people who have the same culture as me.
Why? Is it just easier?
Yes.
(They can talk about things they both know about. Language is a key factor too.)
Do you ever ask about other countries?
Sometimes
What do you do when you’re here? Do you talk or study?
Both
Do you study English?
No
Here I suppose I could have asked, why not. I think I might have, but I might not have understood his answer, or maybe I forgot, or maybe I really didn’t ask. I’m not sure so I don’t want to put anything down here.

I haven't really done much with the implicit rules of place. I don't know why I forgot to ask about them...maybe I was just distracted. But, here are some questions I thought I could ask to deal with those. Can you guys think of any more? How do you feel about these? Do you think they'll be affective in answering my questions about unspoken rules?

Would you feel comfortable talking to someone of a different ethnicity here?
If you heard something interesting being said on the other side of the room, would you join in the conversation? How comfortable would you be if it was someone you didn’t know?
How do people react to people walking through? Coming off the elevators? Going outside to smoke? Talking loudly?
How do people react when someone they don’t know sits next to them? How about when they start talking to them?

Thanks again so much for reading!! ^.^ See you all after break!!!

Tripping Over Turkeys....

Yeah, so other than the fact that it's almost time for Thanksgiving Break...this post has nothing to do with turkeys....^.^'

Informant Script
Do you have time to be interviewed?
Sure. Plenty of time.
Okay. I won’t use your name, so everything will be pretty confidential.
Part 1
1) What year of school are you in?
Freshman; Biology major—was going for chemistry
2) Why do u get here early?
Hour in between Japanese lab and Japanese class….study
3) Do u actually end up studying?
Half the time I end up studying…half the time I take a quick nap.
4) Do you normally sleep out here or in the classroom?
Sleep in classroom…normally its quieter…people aren’t running around…
5) Where are you from?
Albany Ky. (South Central Ky.)
6) Do you have relatives here at UK? How many? Are any of them taking a language course? How do they feel about it?
No
7) So u would rather take a nap then talk with everybody?
If there’s not people to talk to, why not? Nobody’s usually there 70 minutes before class…short nap…not more than 15-20 minutes
8) Do you ever stay after class?
Maybe 5 min after class to talk…but sometimes if there’s a longer conversation
There’s not really much u can do when people are leaving
9) Who do you talk to?
Most of the time it’s from our class
Talks to Section two people some…only on Fridays because that’s when they usually seem to be there
Side note: Not speak to ESL-asked what ESL was…didn’t know when met, probably wouldn’t go that early even if he knew
10) Have you met anyone new here?
Two encounters in calc class…haven’t met anybody new here…
Side Note: Here I could have asked how he met the two people in Calc class…he said they were sitting next to him.
11) Do you talk to people of different ethnicities here?
Talked to nobody of different ethnicity I don’t know…not unless I come early for lab…
12) Why do u think it’s like that…no one speaking to people of different ethnicities?
This area’s mainly for foreign language classes…guess ‘you’re not going to see many non-natives
13) Do you ever make plans to go out anywhere with the people you talk to here?
Rarely…no one’s ever doing anything

Part 2
1) Do you usually sit in the same spot?
I usually sit in a spot that’s not occupied…
2) By not occupied do u mean there could be one person sitting here….
Prefers one with no person, but if has no choice chooses the one with the person he’s most familiar with if all chairs were full and clases were In session….Intermezzo…
3) Why do like/go to Intermezzo?
Good place to get a quick snack
4) Please describe the other people (The people in your class as well as the ones who aren’t) that hang out here.
Standard. Other times…it’s a bit unique….except for when someone rolls up to talk to you…

Part 3
1) What is it about class that makes you come early? What do you like/dislike about class? About JPN class like:
Almost everything. Don’t like…probably…communication…at times it’s a bit noisy…I don’t really ask people to study unless I’m asked…teacher moves a bit fast….
2) Would you feel comfortable approaching someone you didn’t know here? Why or why not?
Not really…depends on whether I need to talk to them or not…I’m not really good at starting conversations
3) Do you ever bring food down here?
Yes…usually on Fridays between the lab and the class…what better way to study with a little sandwich?
4) What about this place makes you feel comfortable enough to take a nap here? Is it the couches or the people or the familiarity and the classes?
Probably the familiarity…
5) Do you ever talk about anything other than class?
Talk about other things...fighter planes…
6) When did you find out about this place? How did you feel about this place as a freshman (sophomore, junior, senior)? How do you feel about it now?
I found this place when I went to find my classes…amazed…tallest building…I’m not sure I really found anything special about this one particular spot because it looked kinda’ plain.
7) Do you feel comfortable?
That I do.
8) Why?
It’s relaxing…
9) How?
Chairs and it’s pretty quite at time…other times there r people to talk to and just sit back and relax and have a chat

ExemplarB

So, yeah, today was embarrassing, haha. I stood up in class and said very little of the important stuff I was supposed to say. It's okay though, I guess. It had to be done; should have been done correctly, but, hey. I need to improve on my presentation skills, I guess. Normally it doesn't go that poorly. : (

Hopefully I can make up for my embarrassing ramblings by posting my whole interview with the side-notes to be picked apart as you all like. It's very long, but I won't demand that you guys read the whole thing to comment or anything. : ) ( I think that has been an implicit rule on the our blogs, what do you guys think?) Anyways, please pick apart pieces you find interesting or just skim it over, and if you want, you can read the whole thing! ^.^ Here you guys go :

I have already talked to this girl before, when I started to do my earlier interviews, but I thought since I got such good feedback from the informal interview that I would do a formal one as well. I did two other interviews today…but this one, I think, gave the most results supporting the existence of a Cosmopolitan Canopy. Since we already knew each other, the formal introduction was pretty much dropped, but I did let her know that the confidentiality policy had changed. These are the basic questions that went along with the answers she gave me, since I failed to write down the exact questions, and some of the answers are generalized and not word-for-word, but there are a couple that are verbatim.

“So, what year are you?”
“I’m a sophomore.”

“How long have you been going to school here at UK? Where are you from?”
“I’m actually a transfer student, and this is my first year here at UK. I went to school somewhere else (I forgot where) and then I went and taught kids in Japan and then I came here.”
(Here, I suppose, I could have gone on to ask about what Japanese schools are like for a broader ethnographic study, but I didn’t think about that at the time…)

“Why do you come here?”
“Most of my conversations during the day happen here...” We proceeded to talk about how she was able to always find a friend from ESL or from Japanese class to talk to while she was there, and the fact that as she talked to her friends, she was introduced to friends of her friends…at which point she said something I feel is a very important indicator of the presence of a Cosmopolitan:
“A comment here, which goes everywhere and suddenly you’re connected to something you never imagined.”
In a Cosmopolitan society, the possibilities of discovery about the nature of individuals are endless and even unimaginable at times. And the way to unlocking this unimaginable information is by asking a single question or making a single comment, however small.
My informant is also doing a similar project for a different class.

“It’s really a unique area, and I’m not really sure why.”

“So, when do you hang out here?”
“Well, I come over after class around ten, and if people are here, I stay; if not, I leave. My next class isn’t until 2. So I sit here and listen to people talk and then maybe someone will talk to me.” Usually, she has a class or knows someone who is going to class.
I think that this sentence is of extreme importance for my research. So far I have found my area to be a neutral space. People hang with people they know, and seldom initiate random conversation. Although, I did meet an exception the other day: I sat next to this guy on one of the benches who was reading. He grunted about something he read in the book, and I commented with “What did you read?” He then proceeded to ask me questions and we talked about philosophy and animation. The book was on philosophy. We even became friends on facebook.com, and I talked to him on facebook.com Sunday night (Nov. 16th).

“So, do you and you’re friends ever hang out anywhere else, or make plans to go hang out while you’re here?”
“Well, sometimes we’ll go out to lunch, and recently we had a classmate’s friend’s birthday party.”
It seems like these are more formal outings, and are fewer than the in-building interactions.

“So you feel like you’ve made a lot of friends in your classes here?”
“I can talk to half the class here, but I only have one friend in my lecture class of seventy other students, which isn’t in here.”

“So you come here because of class or the social interaction? Was the international student aspect an appeal? Why did you start coming here at first?”
(Perhaps I should have asked if she would still meet here even if she didn’t have class in this building.)
“It started out that my class was right around the corner…the international student aspect was an attraction.”
(My informant has taught in Japan, and is also in a Japanese class like me, but not the same one. She mentioned that she is able to point out the difference between people from Korea and Japanese speakers when they open their mouths. )
My informant was also very talkative, so she told me that she depended on noise, since she was from a large family; strangely, she referred to herself as an introvert. Her eyes darted around while she spoke as I tried not to stare at her while talking.

“Not interacting is okay, sometimes…” She says, at first with an affirming tone, and then with a tone of condescension.
“That noise, that element of sound…”
“There are people and then there’s talking and there’s laughter…”
She tells me that she always has her television on in her apartment, since she’s from a large family and is used to the noise. Patterson Office Tower is often buzzing with activity as classes end and begin.

My informant tells me she enjoys “People watching.” Another Cosmopolitan trait in a place that seems to be a neutral space with a great opportunity for Cosmopolitan interaction.
“How would you describe the people that meet here, in as many words as you like?”
“It’s a varied collection of people from around the world who love to sit together and laugh. They are fun-loving and come together whether from a lack of understanding about a concept (Though they socialize more than study); warm and friendly, interesting and intelligent.”

She remarks about studying:
“Conversation in itself is study.”

“So why do you sit here instead of in the seating area in the front when you walk in, or in Intermezzo?”
“This place has a more ‘open,’ and ‘relaxed atmosphere.’”
“It’s more fun, hands down.”
She claimed that the other areas seemed “less inviting,” and she mentioned that the chairs faced each other, making it seem less open for mingling. I think she was talking mainly about Intermezzo, but I’m not quite sure. She also said that you had to have someone go with you. (Implying that Intermezzo is an intimate space)
Our area could have been more comfortable physically, she says, but she also notes what she calls the more “natural lighting” of the back of the Patterson Office Tower, which she likes more than the lighting in Intermezzo. Perhaps the long windows are to shed light on the opportunities provided by the back space—the chance to meet many people from different cultures.

“This area’s a thorough fare.”
“What’s a thorough fare?”
“A place of transit, where people are coming and going.”

Indeed, it is. Many people come in or go out the back doors, whether to go smoke outside, or to enter or leave the building. After I completed this interview, I told my informant good-bye and that I would probably be back later. Then I went out to lunch.

Picking Apart Exemplars

I thought today's class was very helpful, and it was fun to hear what different people were doing and what kind of information they had gotten from their respective observation points. Discussing these exemplars, or "examples" helped me put into perspective some of the details that I hadn't noticed. For instance, I added some questions: "Have you ever met someone by just sitting next to them (on a bench)?" and "Do you welcome newcomers to the area? How do established members react to new people in the area?" "Do you study here? Do you study different subjects (classes, not people)?" I also learned that ethnographists assume nothing, so I added the question "Do you have class back here?"

Since I didn't read my interview today, I thought I would post it...It's not very good because I didn't write the questions when I was asking them, and there are a lot of gaps. My interview mainly turned out to be a lot of really interesting quotes, so I felt, and not so much a storyline dialogue.

Since we already knew each other, the formal introduction was pretty much dropped, but I did let her know that the confidentiality policy had changed. These are the basic questions that went along with the answers she gave me, since I failed to write down the exact questions, and some of the answers are generalized and not word-for-word, but there are a couple that are verbatim.
“So, what year are you?”
“I’m a sophomore.”
“How long have you been going to school here at UK? Where are you from?”
“I’m actually a transfer student, and this is my first year here at UK. I went to school somewhere else (I forgot where) and then I went and taught kids in Japan and then I came here.”
(Here, I suppose, I could have gone on to ask about what Japanese schools are like for a broader ethnographic study, but I didn’t think about that at the time…)
“Why do you come here?”
“Most of my conversations during the day happen here...” We proceeded to talk about how she was able to always find a friend from ESL or from Japanese class to talk to while she was there, and the fact that as she talked to her friends, she was introduced to friends of her friends…at which point she said something I feel is a very important indicator of the presence of a Cosmopolitan:
“A comment here, which goes everywhere and suddenly you’re connected to something you never imagined.”
In a Cosmopolitan society, the possibilities of discovery about the nature of individuals are endless and even unimaginable at times. And the way to unlocking this unimaginable information is by asking a single question or making a single comment, however small.

Stumbling Along...

So, Reecie mentioned that she keeps to herself in areas that are new to her or that she doesn't feel comfortable in. I think that most people do this, and that just as was said in class, that the cosmopolitan canopy is rare and, to a certain degree, so is the cosmopolitan himself. It would be terribly lonely and, I think, impossible, to live on names and basic information alone. Everyone has someone they can discuss their feelings and beliefs with. I think a true cosmopolitan, though, is open to socialize in almost any fitting situation.

I also think that many people wait to be approached, but if everyone is doing the waiting, who's ever going to get approached for social interaction?

I've learned this lesson the hard way. Before I got here, I was much more shy. Even in elementary school, I would wait for the other kids to ask me to play. At first, it was very seldom. Even in high school, I would sit quietly thinking, and people would continue chattering about things occuring in their own circles. Oftentimes, I revert back to my internalized mode, especially when walking around on campus, when I feel embarrased or self-conscious. I'm afraid to make confident eye contact with others. I look down at my shoes or straight ahead, and sometimes, since I am a LandRe, I trip. So I try to watch my feet, lol. They might think I'm stuck-up if I stare for longer than a second, or they'll give me funny looks. ~.~"

Why do some people enjoy testing these boundaries? What about first impressions?

But if people are so accepting, if most people are some version of a cosmopolitan, why would it matter if you tested the boundaries of social contact? But I'm much more social now, and you'll probably see me chatting with people you haven't seen me with before in a seating area. I feel that many of the people around me want to be approached, they want to feel like someone wants to get to know them, and to branch out and meet new people, even if its just to have fun in the moment. They show that they are open to conversation by sitting in public seating areas for no reason, like in my spot. People kill time alone outside the comfort of their rooms.

Most of the time, people don't ignore me...when I approach them, either. They're either open to conversation, or just very accepting.

I feel like my math class is really stiff, though. Most of the time our math teacher asks us questions that he doesn't intend for us to answer, and so when he does intend it, we don't, or, if we do, we answer very quietly. He has a great sense of humor, though. Maybe certain people attract non-cosmopolitan behavior. People that can be taken advantage of. But most people are self conscious of themselves around strangers, so they don't want to try anything. We normally sit in the same seats, so maybe the room is clickish, too. Someone took my seat the other day, which is in the middle and close to the board, and I found myself to be unhappy about it. I told myself it was nothing to get upset about, but it just goes to prove that we are creatures of habit, and that it makes people uncomfortable when the norm is broken, whether it be social or not. Maybe these are some reasons people avoid each other. But just starting small with a simple question can be an easy route to cosmopolitan acceptance. You had the courage to break the norm and made an effort to care.

Nuetrality and Civility...Wow, sounds like politics, huh? Don't worry...

So, I've been really unproductive and air-headed this week(and it's only tuesday! >.<"), and I didn't quite catch what Randolph was saying about the difference between a nuetral place and a civil place. Was she saying that civility, which means politeness is getting to know a person? I believe there's a difference. That maybe, civility(politness) is a way of initiating cosmopolitan behavior, but the act of politeness towards others in itself, is not necessarily cosmopolitan. This, of course, depends on how deeply you get into it. Politeness may be an obligatory feeling to question how someone is doing and minor questions about their past, but if the person takes in this knowledge and decides to further their information and to question and discuss without a feeling of obligation or politeness, then, maybe, politeness is cosmopolitan. Does that make any sense? Hahah. It kind of relates to a question I was asked in english about mandatory community service. What good is community service if the motive behind it isn't genuine? I'm being hypocritical, because I kind of want to think that mandatory community service would be a good thing...

My place is the sitting area in the back of the Patterson Office Tower! I'm excited to be able to do this place, because it is where the ESL and foreign language classes meet! I thought that there would be more interaction between the classes that meet there, but so far I have been disappointed to find that there don't seem to be as many random conversations being started up. I'm starting to think that it's not a cosmopolitan canopy, but I still believe it has the potential to become one. For some people, it may already be. I think it partly depends on the type of person who is put in that environment. Members of different classes in the seating area tend to sit apart from each other, and when there isn't enough room and they're dispersed, they seem less talkative. This isn't to say they aren't open to conversation. Why else would they be in the area "outside" the classroom where they know people will be? I have noticed several people studying, but mostly independently. They tend not to quiz each other, although sometimes they ask each other questions. I talked with Michele and Duncan and I didn't know them before this project, so, that was nice! (I asked if I could use their names...and I am talking about the project, so...) I accidentally started on the interviews early, so I guess I'll need to do some more! ~.~" Most of the people I talked to were upperclassmen, as well. I guess I'll also need them to think back so that I can more clearly see the results of my place in the long term.

The Democratic Field of Relationship Choices and Freedom

Without our discussion in class today, I would have thought that The Handmaid's Tale was about relationship choices and the time associated with them, as well as freedom in a democracy, or, the lack of all of these things in a totalitarian system. In the book, Offred has the recurring urge to steal something, because she feels that she is being denied the basic human right of showing emotion. "I want to be valued , in ways that I am not..."(97).
Freedom is described in the book as being "relative"(231). Indeed, the general values of a society affect who can pratice what where. For instance, in the beginning, Offred's mother goes to a meeting where porn magazines are being set on fire. She values modesty, and so it is that she attempted, with the help of others, to hide from her chid's eyes something she deemed immodest. After the new regime came into power, magazines of all kinds were completely put away from the view of the handmaids in an attempt to create within them an extreme sense of modest behaviour. When she visits the Commander in his study, she envies him his pen, and the freedom he has to wield it.
One of my favorite symbols of choice in the book is the discussion Offred has about flowers on page 212: "I long for one, just one[dandelion], rubbishly and insolently random and hard to get rid of and perennially yellow as the sun." Here, she is symbolizing her longing for a crush of her own, a crush for someone "insolently random and hard to get rid of," and someone who constantly makes her feel good, just like the dandelion that is "perennially" yellow and bright. Blow, and you tell the time. When you blow the seeds into the air, while you are in a relationship, you have the ability to decide when your feelings change. It was daisies for love though, and we did that too. Here is a literal translation for love.
I believe the obsession Offred had with time had to do with her purpose of being on Earth. She felt that her body, which had so much emphasis placed on it as a sacred child-bearing vessel, was not as important as it was made out to be. "But this is wrong, nobody dies from lack of sex. It's lack of love we die from"(103).


I didn't think as much at first, about The Handmaid's Tale being an example of field notes. Though, apparently, there are many instances where it can be seen as so. The above, apparently, are mainly just descriptive subpoints about the values of this gender and religion-based community with a military enforcement similar to that of the Byzantines.
Over the years, the U.S. has become less and less of a religious based nation due to a rise in diversity. This has been exhibited by the recent attempts to extract the phrase "Under God" from the pledge of allegiance.
The social culture of the community described in the book is mostly made up for women. Like the Puritans, modesty is a common value. The Puritan came to accept, so long ago, a "variant of English culture that rejected as 'ungodly entertainments' the songs, dances and sports enjoyed by most Englishmen (Website)" Compliance to religious secular authority is something that can still be seen in churches today. Many people trust the interpretation of religious documents by clergymen more than they do their own. The handmaids are quiet Counter-Cosmopolitans. This is because their duty forces them to reproduce and allows them little else to do than to be "surrogate mother(s)"(305). Their duty is to birth children for the "Wives" of "Commanders." Which commander they get sent to is arranged based on the wives who cannot birth. The daughters of the handmaids have arranged marriages. Does anyone think that an arranged marriage can generate true love? The book seems to give merit to this idea, and yet, discredit it at the same time.

"Puritanism-Religious Practice." 6 Nov. 2008. http://science.jrank.org/pages/10924/Puritanism-Religious-Practice.html.

Halsall, Paul . "Introduction." 22 Mar. 2004. 6 Nov. 2008. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/byzantium/.


Stewart, David . "The U.S. Constitution and Faith In God." Dec. 2007. 6 Nov. 2008. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Miscellaneous/faith_and_freedom.htm.

The Undercurrent of Religious Heterogeneous Society

When stereotypical attitudes about the behavior of women are taken literally, the result is Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. In this tale, women are seen merely as reproductional tools of religion. Yet they are encouraged to cover themselves and to dress and act severely modest. Their faces cannot be seen by men, and they are allowed to say only mainly a few set phrases to one another, such as "May the Lord open," which is related to the Bible verse: I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children. (114) The women's freedom is restricted, and this greatly sorrows the handmaid, who longs for human touch and consolement.
As one would guess, this modesty makes it difficult for one to interact with the opposite sex in a way that produces a loving, cheerful relationship. What if we didn't have the option of getting a divorce nowadays? All of the men in this book are seen as potential partners, and thus, the handmaids are forced to avoid them because their partners have already been selected for them. This is similar to the traditional value that many families used to favor about arranged marriage, however, the handmaids do not get married, and the cause of their selected partnership has more to do with fulfilling God's word and with subservience to men and religion than it does with power and prestige.

In an online book preview of a book by Catie Gill, the point is brought up that there used to be a "Cultural commonplace" about the difference between women and men. Women were and sometimes are still seen as "The more libidinous sex"(60). Libidinous referring to sexual desire. Why this occurs, I'm not quite sure. I am inclined to believe that men can be just as sexually driven as women. Maybe it is because women talk about the negative repurcussions of pregnancy more?

"Modesty is invisibility, said Aunt Lydia. Never Forget it. To be seen--to be seen--is to be--her voice trembled--penetrated"(28).
Modesty is another value that has greatly changed over the decades. Women used to conceal themselves and were strictly allowed to have sexual relations with one partner. In The Handmaid's Tale, women are passed on to different partners so that each male partner may have an heir. However, in the "Tale" the handmaid struggles with the relationship between her body, which is used but hidden and her mind, which is accused of being of no consequence.
"I used to think of my body as an instrument, of pleasure, or a means of transportation, or an implement for the accomplishment of my will....There were limits, but my body was nevertheless lithe, single, solid, one with me"(73).
Notice how the Handmaid says with me. She feels that her body is her definition in this dystopia, and she is denied the basic freedom of personality by the strict restrictions on mannerism forced on her.
Today in society, multipled partners are looked down upon, but the consequences of having sexual relations with more than one person are dependent on the circumstances of the relationship and the people involved, and not on strict rules of society based upon religious contexts.
Does this mean that religion has fallen out of style? Or does it mean that religion seems too strict for today's "laid-back" society?

Things within shadow, such as an underlying current of traditional values about gender can often be brought to light in writing and in life. In The Handmaid's Tale, values about the libido (Sexual desire) of women, and their role within religion and their image in society are revealed to us, in a way that may or may not be consisitent within our current societies.
Personally, I hope that shadows such as these do not come into the light in the same way as in The Handmaid's Tale.

Gill, Catie. Women in the Seventeenth-Century Quaker Community. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2005. Google Book Search. 3 Nov. 2008 http://books.google.com/books?id=1zez9fIHuHYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=women+in+the+seventeenth+century+quaker+community.

How Appiah and Anderson Relate

First off, I would like to thank Mehjigsaw and all of you who have commented on my posts for all of your wonderful commenting!! I feel like my last post was a lot of...let's say...information taken from the reading and maybe not enough opinion on the reading on my part. What do you guys think?

On another note, here is my interpretation of how Appiah and Anderson studies relate:

"Essentially, cosmopolitan canopies allow people of different backgrounds the chance to slow down and indulge themselves, observing, pondering, and in effect, doing their own folk ethnography, testing or substantiating stereotypes and prejudices or, rarely, acknowledging something fundamentally new about the other"(Anderson, 25)

This "testing or substantiating stereotypes and prejudices" occurs when meeting people whom Appiah would refer to as "Imaginary strangers." We understand the concept of the imaginary stranger introduced in chapter 6 of "Cosmopolitanism" (someone whom we have prejudices or stereotypes for), and we also know that it can be someone whom we know or do not know, someone in the same country, or another one far off. Because of this, and Anderson's notation of this type of behavior in the Terminal, we are able to place terms on the behaviors he has noticed and truly deem the place as cosmopolitan. Our understanding of Cosmopolitanism came from Appiah, and now our knowledge of its appearance in everyday life is given to us by Anderson.

Appiah's Cosmopolitanism and Elijah Anderson's "The Cosmopolitan Canopy" are also similar in that they both describe the concept of active human understanding known as "Cosmopolitanism" in which people observe and respect others' beliefs and formulate or modify their own based on what they have found during their interactions. I found several similar trains of thought within the two writings that can help readers to gain a better understanding of both. For instance, one such concept occurs in "The Cosmopolitan Canopy" on page twenty-one: "In these circumstances, people carry on their business but also engage in folk ethnography and formulate or find evidence for their folk theories about others with whom they share the public space." This fits in with Appiah's description of how Cosmopolitanism involves listening to others about their views and not neccesarily agreeing with them, but simply considering different ways of thought. If we have read Appiah's Cosmopolitanism, we can infer that folk ethnography and folk theories involve our initial suspicions about people and patterns of thought.

I think, that by having read "Cosmopolitanism," we understand the mechanics of how a Cosmopolitanist operates. We realize that by listening and considering, Cosmopolitans have a respect for other people's differences. In "The Cosmopolitan Canopy," this respect for diversity is mentioned (See page 28, the second paragraph under Conclusion), but the methods we use for obtaining this respect is not fully explained. Anderson's work focuses more on the effects of the place rather than the abilities of the Cosmopolitan, therefore, having read Cosmopolitanism, we understand as readers of "The Cosmopolitan Canopy" how he attributes this importance to the Terminal and how to formulate our opinions about the importance of place in the Cosmopolitanist effort.



"Such places are important settings for diverse strangers to "learn" how to get along with one another, albeit at times superficially."

-"The Cosmopolitan Canopy"

Branching Out Beneath The Canopy

In "The Cosmopolitan Canopy," Elijah Anderson expresses the importance of communicating in a way that modifies or supports ones' "folk ethnography."

"In these circumstances, people carry on their business but also engage in folk ethnography and formulate or find evidence for their folk theories about others with whom they share the public space"(21).

Folk ethnography entails "particularistic" and "localized ideologies" that are specific to each person or ethnic group(30). For instance, a person who is American might not bow out of respect when speaking to a business associate.

This observing of the behaviors of different people and forming an opinion about how they do things leads to "testing or substantiating stereotypes or prejudices, or, rarely, acknowledging something fundamentally new about the other," as well as an understanding of "how people are" and "how things work"(25, 22).

This is why the Cosmopolitan Canopy, a place in which people are interactively curious about one another is important in keeping the world going 'round.

I agree that the Cosmopolitan Canopy is important. Not only do we formulate the most efficient ways to live our lives by observing others, challenging ourselves socially under the great green leaves of the "Canopy" helps us to feel empathy and to understand how best to help others live their lives efficiently and effectively. None of us knows the truth about everything, so learning about the many existent diverse ways of living can keep us on the path to accomplishing our own goals, as well as the track of being healthily curious enough to enjoy the world we live in.

The Red Dotted Subtribe

First off, I really enjoyed the short film by Tiffany Shlain. I thought, as a film, it had a powerful concluding question, it was entertaining and it made you think, it was funny, historical, and it started out with a clever usage of a chain email sent out quite a few years ago--around the year 2000.
And everything came at you quick so that you got the basic idea.

From my point of view, the movie discussed the stereotypes put on people who have Jewish beliefs and how they're views are often disrespected by non-cosmopolitans, such as in Vienna where they were forced to wear horned hats, or the pogroms on Russia.
"The glorification of celebrities creates a culture of insiders and outsiders.Throughout history, the Jewish tribe has been treated as outsiders."

I thought that in the beginning when the narrator tells how diamonds are made, that this phrase was very symbolic of the relationship between people with Jewish beliefs, and people with non-Jewish beliefs. Right after:
"Diamonds are formed when carbon is subjected to intense pressure over long periods of time," is said, the screen turns black and the flames falter out into silence. Then the music starts back up again and the film resumes merrily on its way. I think this emphasis was placed on the sentence for a reason. Maybe the theoretical "Diamond" is the perfect image that some people try to create by forcing this vision on others until they relinquish their beliefs or practices.

In a review, I read someone's view that the movie was made to explain how people with Jewish beliefs react to stereotypes about Jewish identity as well. In the film, it mentioned how Jewish people fell silent when talking about their religion.

"You don't look like your people. You don't act like your people." "Impossible, because you are your people."
And, I think, you make your own person.

Anderson, Annie . "'The Tribe' review." Venus Zine. 29 Jun. 2006. 24 Oct. 2008. https://www.venuszine.com/articles/art_and_culture/film/24/the_tribe_review.

Quit Monkeying Around.....

Hey guys! Unload all that "Mental baggage" and listen up! I think that paying extra attention to your surroundings like in our actvity on tuesday might not relieve stress like she told us. It may help in that your mindset is shifted so that it pays closer attention to something else, but few can stay in this observant state forever. I can see where it might make you more stressful if you're in a bad enough mood, because then you start worrying about more than you can process, and the thoughts and emotions that are really bothering you are still stuck inside, buried beneath the outpour of observations. However, several times I have been taking a walk out the backroads at home and found my observations comforting. I like to observe things as I walk by. I don't think that was the point of the exercise, but I just thought I'd bring up this idea. What about you all? Did the exercise relieve any stress for you afterwards? Do you think that that style of writing can relieve stress?

I do think that the exercise was a good one. Just like Bafa Bafa, it helped me to realize that there are other ways of thinking, and that interchanging between them isn't too hard, and maybe I should try it more often. With Bafa Bafa, I needed to hang back and observe before entering a situation, and with this writing exercise, I also needed to hang back and observe instead of pouring all of my emotions out onto the page so that I could support them with details for the reader or listener.

SL Pro. Post 2

The real Amsterdam happens to be the artistic capital of the Netherlands and has many widely acclaimed museums, such as the Rijks Museum and the Stedelijk Museum, which houses many 19th and 20th century works by artists such as Van Gogh and Picasso. There are a couple of art galleries in SL Amsterdam, but the mature areas seem to be in the more accessible and populated areas. The museums seem kind of tucked away on the edge of Enterprise. My guess is that SL Amsterdam is in progress. Many of the buildings seem rather new, such as the Barock Museum, which was made in June of this year. The day before our project was due in class, I exclaimed to Okosu with excitement that art had been added in a once-empty building. I later found out that the art was added by a different person than the one who built the building we found it in. In “About Land,” I also learned that the land in SL Amsterdam is “Group owned.” Though I haven’t yet talked with the members of the group about it, they seem to be allowed to rent the land out to certain people, who are then allowed to be creative with their space. For instance, one renter made a sort of “beach house” on their plot.

The land is very interactive; there are “love spheres” and other intimate blue and pink globes all over the place, hidden and in visible places; however, there are also several places that are group-oriented or restrictive. In one building I was called a "slave" and told that the door was closed. Most of the lamp posts in Sin Alley are group-only camping sites, and the geisha house is for women only. But when Rupert entered this forbidden-zone, the only thing that happened to him was that he was politely asked to leave. At first I found the existence of the Japanese-style site within Amsterdam, but then I thought upon the way people view the geisha, and I understood. Geisha in Japan are often associated with the red-light areas, which many of them are forced to turn to for funding to continue their practice of the traditional arts. There’s also a movie theatre that anyone can go in and watch old or new movies. When I went, I picked 3:10 to Yuma, and it played in English.
The people in Amsterdam tend to be unresponsive a lot of the time because they are usually “camping,” or, sitting in specified places to earn money. The people that are not camping can be rather friendly. I met a guy from Germany and was added to his friends’ list.

So, as a summary, Amsterdam in-world is very interactive, the people are mainly there for camping, but are friendly if not always attentive, and the land is very detailed, if not always accurate.

“Amsterdam Art Galleries (Amsterdam, Netherlands)." World Guides: City Guides and Travel Information. 20 Oct. 2008. 20 Oct. 2008. http://www.amsterdam.world-guides.com/art_galleries.html.

SL Pro. Post 1

I found the Second Life Project to be a very fun and interesting project. First off, it was great being a part of Team Backline! Secondly, I enjoyed picking apart pieces of SL Amsterdam and wondering about their existence and the reason certain pieces of it were made the way they were. Until Rupert printed off some notes on the real Amsterdam, I actually had no idea where it was out-of-world, and I had nothing to compare and contrast the in-world Amsterdam to, though. I think this project helped me to learn a little bit about the real Amsterdam, even if SL Amsterdam wasn’t completely accurate.

When I first got to SL Amsterdam, I got all excited because I saw this huge windmill:

I assumed that Amsterdam had something to do with the Dutch, but I didn’t know anything about the Dutch, or where Amsterdam was on a real map. I later learned that the real Amsterdam is in Europe.

I knew from the discussion of places in class and by the waterways and the boats that Amsterdam was a port city. I found out that the architecture and arts and practices of the city were all affected by the residency of merchants; artists; financiers and other “well-off” people of the like. For instance, the housing was very ornate. Windows were decorated with fancy curtains. The tops of buildings had ornate “gables” with depictions or decorous patterns. In some alleyways there is elaborate graffiti, which was once considered an art:

Also, the real Amsterdam happens to be the artistic capital of the Netherlands and has many museums. There are a couple of art galleries in SL Amsterdam, but the mature areas seem to be in more populated areas. This little beauty didn't open until close to the end of our project:

There were also many places to store items. Merchants in real-life Amsterdam used to build pulley-systems into their homes so that they could transfer the items they stored there from floor to floor. In “About Land,” SL Amsterdam is deemed a “commercial sim," and it is possible to store your items in a warehouse or a train:

I suppose that in a port city, it would be logical for there to be a lot of foreign influences. Below is a picture of a Chinese restaurant in SL Amsterdam:

Experiencing the Cosmos Pt.2

First off, I want to start out by saying that I don't like this following phrase, but I believe it has been a picture of my life here at UK, and in general.
"It is true now, as it was true one and two and three centuries ago, that success in life depends on being enmeshed in a web of relationships"(p.92).

The reason I don't like this sentence is because it makes it seem as if, in the case that a human being has no social prominency, he or she cannot accomplish anything. I don't believe that. There are many independents who have accomplished great feats without having contacts; some of our founders weren't favored by their home country; there are many college students without social credit due to the fact that they're in a new place that are paying for school out of their own pockets and doing their own laundry and paying their own bills and making their own plans.

Also, I think the definition of the word "success" can have a different meaning for different people. One person's definition may mean learning how to become ambidexterous. But who can help them with that? Someone would have to provide him or her with a pencil to practice with--unless he or she made it by himself or herself out of a tree in the forest. But then, humanity created the pencil, did we not? And it's not that he or she couldn't use his or her surroundings to create a new concept, but the person would have to go of the concepts from before, and since the world is not new, we rely on human concepts.

I don't think that Appiah means one can't be successful by doing things on one's own, I think that he means that we will always be under the influence of humanity.

Now that I've explained the concept, I can tell you why the above sentence relates to my college experience. In the fact that I am new to this university and am trying to do things I've never done before, I have been relying on people that do know to help me get started with my goals. I ask them for information, and they provide it, instructing me on what to do to accomplish my goals and be "successful." I've asked several people for information relating to my goals of achieveing the life I want. An example of this would be providing me with info. on how to change colleges so that I can become a teacher, and helping me to make up missed assignments so that I can get credit for the class and graduate; Also, I have been provided information about different programs that will allow me to go to Japan. Without these knowledgable informants, I would be very lost. And where else would we even know to do "assignents" or become a "teacher" if other people didn't exist?

Experiencing the Cosmos-Getting Ready to Actively Explore Japan

"But what's wanted, as Adam Smith would have anticipated, is the exercise of reason, not just explosions of feeling"(p. 170).

Adam Smith is a Scottish philosopher who questioned basic human morality in an attempt to figure out our obligations to strangers. He suggests that we cannot attempt to give the same amount of attention and care to everyone at once, because the demands would be impracticable. In this section of the book, Appiah also discusses the importance and the affects of reason when it is exercised by cosmopolitanists. He specifically alludes to Adam Smith when talking about how to donate to world charities affectively. Ultimately what he is truly trying to say is that cosmopolitanists don't just think that respecting differences is important, but how you react to them is also important. Since it is possible, we should all act to get rid of extreme poverty(the kind that kills and takes the meaning out of lives) by giving our fair share of "entitlements"(p. 164).

In my time here, I have been trying to be more involved with the things that I am interested in. I look forward to diving deeper into activities on campus that will put me in a place to interact with people who have had experiences with the Japanese culture, so that I can finally immerse myself when I visit Japan and have the opportunity to learn about the country, the people, and their culture for myself. Since there are so many opportunities here, I have been jumping at them as soon as they arise, talking to people from Japan, joining the Japanese culture club, and planning to go abroad. By being involved, I know that one day I will have the opportunity to see and experience Japan for myself and I will be able to fulfill at least one of my life's goals, because I will know where to look and I will be better prepared. And isn't it better to have developed a repect for another culture by having actively participated in activities that taught about that culture and the people that follow it?

Chapter 10: The Finale of Kindness

In chapter 10, Appiah defines the basic human rights as health;food;shelter;education and choice. He suggests that a nation-state would be on much too grand a level to accurately give all people their basic "entitlements." He claims the nation-state would be likely to grow too powerful, that it would often be unresponsive to local needs and that it would lessen the variableness of "institutional experimentation" from which we learn about new ways to live.
The United Nations is the closest we have to a nation-state government.
I believe that entry into the UN is optional, so every nation has agreed to follow any specific rules that might apply. Appiah says about acceptance: "accepting the nation state means accepting that we have a special responsibility for the life and justice of our own;but we still have to play our part in ensuring that all states respect the rights and meet the needs of their citizens"(163).
World WarII brought up tragedy upon such a scale that the world will never forget. The world had never seen anything that could measure up to Hitler's massacre of the followers of Judaism. The small value Hitler put in their lives encroached massively, to say the least, on the basic rights of the Jews, whom he detained and sacrificed for the sake of "homogeneity." Hitler was definitely a counter-cosmopolitan. Perhaps it was these events, among the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese that shocked the U.S., that spawned the United Nation's Declaration of Human Rights. This Declaration was a reaction to the most atrocious encroachments of basic rights the world has ever seen. It was spawned out of the desperation to prevent the same destructive events from happening again.
Many argue that the United Nations Security Counsel has been too slow in reacting to the recent massacres of Darfur. This is just one example of the uneffectiveness of such a system. It would be impossible for the security councel to come to any conclusions about how to solve a global problem, would it not? Then again, the group is optional to join, I believe, and thus the countries in it should share similar views. It kind of goes back to what Appiah said about "we can agree on the right thing to do, even if we can't agree on why." If we can't decide, we can at least stay up-to-date on the issues of other countries, and try to understand ways to help them. I think the UN also boosts the moral confidence of the world's population. People see that nations have gathered to support the idea of basic rights protection, therefore, they want to help more.

Muravchik, Joshua, Feinstein, Lee. "The Effectiveness of the UN Security Council." Council On Foreign Relations. 25-29 Sep. 2006. 12 Oct. 2008. http://www.cfr.org/publication/11520/.

In Rurouni Kenshin(Ruu-rooh-knee ken-shin), a favorite show of mine when I was a kid, an ex-samurai tried to take over Japan. In one episode, the main character, Kenshin(Ken-shin) goes to a town under the mad ex-warrior's control, and finds the people there to be scared to death of the government, and being brutalized if they resist it. Obviously not every place was like this, but the main point is that Shishio, despite the fact that he endorsed this brutal behavor, could not watch over and control everywhere. Maybe this example corresponds to the power of the nation-state, maybe not.

PAGE 174: Who are Some Cosmopolitans Near You?
I think many of the students here at UK are cosmoplitans. All of them were open to accepting a new lifestyle--that of a college student instead of going on to get a job that doesn't require a degree. If they were open to trying out this new lifestyle to see if they could better themselves, then perhaps they were open to meeting new friends here as well. Especially the study abroad, living and learning communities and study abroad students! These people are surely cosmopolitans since they have a curiosity for other cultures, right?! Of course, it also depends on how they respond to these other cultures...they must understand and "tolerate."


Oh! And by the way...when I was reading this chapter, I was reminded of the question of wether or not we are "born" kind. On page 156, Appiah interprets Adam Smith's passage to inquire about "how our 'passive feelings' can be so selfish while our 'active principles' are often so generous." When I read Fruits Basket by Natsuki Takaya(I'm still in the process.), the main character's mother, a wise role model for her daughter and her friends, states that "all we are born with are selfish desires for food and things..." and that "everyone develops their own sense of kindness."

Chapters 8 and 9

Chapter 8: The Possession of Stuff

Here's a more detailed "overview," to use Meh Jigsaw's term, of ch.8.



People feel connected to art; like they are entitled to it just because it lies within their land. But people everywhere can be affected by art. This shows how we cross the border of locality into globality or "globalness" (I guess it sounds better)--Art is a universal value, and not one that is simply admired or understood by those closest to you, wether the artifacts are from your culture or not. With this thought in mind, Appiah believes that art specific to a culture, or "cultural patrimony" should be taken care of and shared, and artifacts from non-existant cultures (such as the Nok statues) should go to the place where they will be cared for and respected.



Chapter 9

Oh, this is so late!! >.<" Counter Cosmopolitans are very different from the cosmos. Thus, the term "counter-cosmos." Counter Cosmopolitans favor homogeneity and universalism without toleration. In the book, Appiah gives an example of this as Muslims in Al-Kaida that try to kill believers of other religions. Universalism, to them, means having ONE universal truth, no matter what they have to do to acquire it. Whereas for Cosmopolitans, universalism means respecting that there are many different truths and beliefs (Pluralism). Counter Cosmopolitans encourage conversation, while Counter-Cosmos fear communication as too powerful an opposing influence.

I didn't really think I knew of any counter-cosmos here at UK at first, but then I remembered the free-speech corner in front of the student center. Though free speech is definitely a cosmopolitan action because it encourages communication and the sharing of views, it sometimes seems that the performers there are trying to impose their will on the passersby. For instance, one of my friends said they were yelled at by a guy there, and he told them that they wouldn't go to Heaven, but to somewhere else. He was trying to scare them into believing what he believed, i guess.

Page 153 "People Don't Matter Very Much"

Appiah claims that very few have this notion in their heads that people don't matter at all. Instead, some think that other people don't matter very much. The only ones that can fully complete our goals are ourselves. Therefore, we tend to ignore others when they aren't somehow involved in helping us with our goals, or are standing in the way of what we deem most important in our lives. Also, it's difficult to imagine what others are thinking and feeling, especially if we have preconcieved ideas about these things. This is kind of the same thing with how we treat animals. We don't know how they are feeling a lot of the time, and we hardly ever know what they are thinking.

But animals have shown signs of feelings. They cower before being taken to the vet. Sometimes birds sing during the day, not always at the same time. The actions of animals are not completely methodical. No matter what tongue they think in, animals can still feel. And feelings, wether deemed pleasant or unpleasant in human-speak, are still feelings. Obsessive cruelty to any creature that feels, I think, is wrong.

But then, why do I still believe in not being a vegetarian?

First of all, I love chicken.

Second of all, it's easy for me not to be one; but that doesn't make it right.

As far as I've heard, it's possible to pull off. Some would argue that that is one reason animals were put on this earth, but I believe that, just like humans, they are here to be observed and interacted with.

It seems a bit like I have gotten off topic, but I feel that vegetarianism has relevance to animal cruelty, and the concept of creatures with feelings not mattering. Many people see killing animals as cruel. Some see it as cruel even if you eat them. They can feel pain, after all. The kind of cruelty I have been talking about pertains to throwing rocks or beating animals or things like that, but I guess I would consider killing terrible, too. It would make me feel guilty to do it. (Speaking of which, what about bugs? We get over that...) And what about how some places put cows right next to a slaughterhouse?

But the main point is...I think people don't think other people matter as much because they don't understand them, or think they have a more important goal in mind. Appiah says we should try to change their minds and stay out of their way. I guess, with vegetarianism, vegetarians could give examples on the benefits of their way of thinking...such as health benefits, try to change us meat-eaters' minds, and let us find out for ourselves how animals really feel about what is happening to them.

Cosmos Chapters 6 and 7

Chapter 6 Questions...
I believe that understanding is imperative when communicating with the "stranger." If you continue to communicate based on your preconceptions of their personality, they may not understand you and may begin to lose interest in what you have to say. After all, we tend to lose interest when someone's rambling on about a topic of which we have no clue about. For instance, if I started talking about how random and funny a Japanese cartoon was, you would probably tell me that you'd never heard of it and go talk to someone else about another television show that you had seen the night before. Also, with the great diversity of people within cultures, the chances of your assumptions being right is not very great.

Appiah suggests that a connection between all people is through a respect for difference and not through identity. He uses the example that art can have an effect on anyone of any nationality, and not just the people of the country in which it was made. I have talked to several people from different states and different countries since I arrived at UK. Despite our difference in nationalites, we hung out and so were able to ask each other questions about each other's countries. I expected to have language difficulties and value difficulties when talking to people from other countries.
I've befriended many girls in my sorority despite the fact that they are from different towns than me.
My roommate and I are also quite different, despite being friends. She sleeps in, has a job, and is very sociable. I sometimes wake up early, and like to listen to Japanese music, which she doesn't like as much as me. But she still puts up with me despite this fact.

Chapter Overviews:

Chapter 6: Imaginary Strangers
Before, I thought that the imaginary stranger was someone you hadn't met, someone maybe, from a different country. While this could be the case, it could also be someone you have met. The "imaginary stranger,"after all, is someone whom you suppose is one type of person, but may or may not be a part of the "statistical norm"(p.95). I guess this would correlate to the word, "Stereotype?" You will always be engaging in conversation with "particular strangers," whom you want to get to know, and who start out as "imaginary strangers."

Chapter 7:Cosmopolitan Contamination
Cultural Imperialism is when one country or culture tries to force its beliefs and behaviours on another country or culture. Appiah dismisses it because he claims that the other culture and individuals from the other culture choose what they take out of the cross-cultural experiences. Often this depends on the connections people make to connect the other culture to their own(such as Sipho thinking that he should be able to talk to his father after watching television. versus the Israeli Arabs that saw a show that confirmed the thought that abused women should return to their fathers)
The "Golden Rule of Cosmopolitanism"
"I am human:nothing human is alien to me."The statment "I am human" refers to our curiosity and our willingness to connect with other people and cultures. Also, I think the fact that we are human means that we can always find something to communicate with each other about.
"Cultural Purity is an oxymoron."
Cultural Purity is an oxymoron (two words that contradict each other) because each culture is very diverse within itself, as well as in the general picture. Just about every culture has been
"Contaminated" by foreign influence of some sort. However, I feel that the choices a culture(a group of people with a common understanding) make to adapt are not necessarily changes to the nature of that culture. On page 106, Appiah mentions "keeping authentic ways" but whom other than those in that culture can decide what they should do and which ways are "authentic?" The ex. he gives is the choice the Zao make to decide wether they should wear baseball caps or not. I believe this point is summed up on page 113, when Appiah says "The point is that people in each place make their own uses even of the most famous global commodities."

Chapter 8: Whose Culture Is It, Anyway?
People feel local connections to art found within their area (Cultural Patrimony.) However, any specific art piece, art from any area, can affect people from all over the world. With this thought, we must realize that art is meant to be not only taken care of, but shared.

Cosmos Chapters 5 and 6

Before I start off on my useless yammerings...is anybody even reading this? If you are, I'm not going to force you to reply or anything, but I love hearing from you all, and any opinion or encouragement, or even criticism would be appreciated!
And, of course, you don't have to read it all...

On the wiki it said we needed to answer these questions instead, so here I go...
1)What does "Shared horizons or meaning" mean to you here at UK?
2)How does race, gender or background(rural or urban) impact those shared values?

1) So, I''m guessing that "shared horizons of meaning" means a community's shared values. And, I'm assuming that most people here at UK value education since they are paying to come here. Judging by how much people seem to study and how my sorority seems to be very protective of study habits, I'd say that for the most part, I've found this to be a truth. I hope that this respect for education continues, because I will more than likely rely on this understanding to make good grades.
2) I'm not going to say that race or gender have as large an impact on studying as background. I think, depending on what you've been raised around, you may see something as more rare and valuable, or you may recognize a significance in it. Or, you may completely take it forgranted. Like education as a value:if you went to school in a poor neighborhood, you may realize the importance of getting a good education, whereas if you live in a rich one, you may think education is just something you are forced to take part in.

First off, I want to answer the questions that were given to us, and then I will pose my own.
1) Why do we bother having conversations?
Though many of us have the same values, we argue over their significance and application. For ex. Many of us value our human lives, but when does the life of an unborn fetus begin?
>>>Is abortion murder?
Feel free to post on this topic if you like, but please keep it short, and not the usual 'it's just killing.' Try to back up your answers.

We hole conversations to learn to "get along." (p.78)

2)Strangers:Who are the imaginary ones, and are there more types of strangers? What kind are they?
I think that the imaginary stranger is the person from another country that you haven't met, and another type is the type that's near you. Possibly, people that you have met but don't know everything about. (Because you can never know everything about any one person)
An encounter between strangers might lead to understanding as you compare likes(non-human universals) and therefore, become interested in the things that you may not share. ex. Punjabs worry about Punjabis in Canada, and therefore become interested in Canadian lifestyle and customs.

Now here are my comments and questions:
p.69-70
But when the issue is what to do, differences in what we think and feel can fall away. Indeed, our political coexistence, as subjects or citizens, depends on being able to agree about practices while disagreeing about their justification. This doesn't necessarily mean, however, that they will. An example of this is what happened between us and Japan during WW2. Japan's pride forced them to refuse to surrender, and thus, political conflict continued to rise.
p.69
Who but someone in the grip of a terrible theory would want to insist on an agreement on principles before discussing which movie to go to, what to have for dinner, when to go to bed?
Do we have time to worry about whether we're making the best decisions? Do we have the time not to?
p.70-71
If the government isn't allowed to have anything to do with religion, but our rules are based off of what we're used to and have seen before, then how is our Constitution truly free of the values of a predominately Christian society? Are values connected to religion? Are there some rules that other cultures with another predominant religion would disagree with? What about the forest societies that practice cannibalism?
p.70
I think the government's treatment of the first amendment is a combination of protecting the gov. from religion and religion from the gov., protecting the people from the civil discord brought on by forcing a certain religion, a commitment to the sovereignty of the human conscience and religious toleration as an end.
p.73
A large part of what we do we do because it is just what we do.
Think of it in this way. When we go on vacation, our schedule gets changed and we sleep later; sometimes we miss our favorite shows on television. When we take trips to anywhere, what we normally do gets thrown off. We each have our own unique style of living. But it can be changed when we go somewhere or choose to live somewhere else.

Rationalization of what we do usually comes after the intuitive reaction, but is this really a problem if many things turn out as unplanned anyway?

If we didn't have the right to protest traditional unwritten rules of society in a non-harmful way, how else would change occur?

Page 79
"You taught me language and my profit on't/ Is, I know how to curse."
Does anyone else hate it when someone teaches a foreigner curse words when they first get here? That totally bugs me!!

Page 83
Is it our fault if our commercial messages unintentionally persuade the attitudes of people in other places?